Case Analysis - McSparran Vs. Larson
Autor: jaii13 • February 10, 2012 • Case Study • 306 Words (2 Pages) • 1,967 Views
Yania vs. Bigan
Facts: John E. Bigan is being accused for the drowning of Joseph F. Yania who voluntarily jumped from the side wall of a height of 16 to 18 feet into water and drowned on John E. Bigan’s property.
Issue: Is John E. Bigan responsible for Joseph F. Yania’s death?
Answer: No
Court Reasoning: The court found that with out a shadow of a doubt Yania, whether reckless and dangerous was responsible for his own actions. He trusted his own skills and jumped into that water so the case was dismissed.
My opinion: I agree with the court. Everything the widow claims is off of hearsay so she is going by what she thinks happened. It was his own stupidity, whether a great swimmer or not, to jump from a side wall of 16 to 18 feet into water to start a pump that could have been handle in a different way. I feel that Yania was very careless and wasn’t thinking clearly on other ways to get the pump started.
McSparran vs. Larson
Facts:
According to the plaintiff there was alleged participation to reporting false accounting of revenues and enrollment figures so CEC stocks could be sold at inflation prices. The defendant’s also failed to act in the face of evidence, which was brought to the court’s attention.
Issue:
Are the Board members guilty?
Answer:
Yes
Court Reasoning:
The plaintiff has told us who, what, when, where, and how the story raises reasonable doubt about the defendant’s personal liability in this matter. The defendant’s are interested parties to any demand upon the Board of Director’s to institute litigation.
My
...