AllFreePapers.com - All Free Papers and Essays for All Students
Search

Donoghue V. Stevenson Case Study

Autor:   •  August 20, 2018  •  Case Study  •  1,331 Words (6 Pages)  •  745 Views

Page 1 of 6

CONTENT:

SECTION A:

1) Donoghue v. Stevenson case study

2) About offer and acceptance

3) About apparent and actual authority

SECTION B:

About the partnership and company

Section A:

1) Introduction:

Think that you can’t sue the manufacturer for their negligence if you don’t have a contract. But It happens before 1932. After Donoghue v. Stevenson case neighborhood principle formed at the House of Lorde’s in United kingdom.

a)Facts of Donoghue v. Stevenson

a) While going to a store, Ms. May Donoghue was given a container of ginger lager, which had obtained for her by a companion. The container contain deteriorated snail. Because of the container was not made of clear glass. Donoghue had devour the vast majority of its substance before she ended up mindful of the snail. She later fell sick and a doctor determined her to have gastroenteritis. Donoghue along these lines made lawful move against Mr. David Stevenson, the maker of the ginger lager. She stopped a writ in the Court of Sessions looking for cost for harms.

b) Ratio in the case:

Donoghue couldn't sue Stevenson for rupture of agreement, since companion had bought the drink her. Rather, her attorneys asserted that Stevenson has ruptured an obligation of care to his shoppers and had caused damage through carelessness.

Obiter in the case:

c) Side remarks or side comments.

The case set up that makers have an obligation of care to the end customers or clients of their items. As per Lord Atkin's proportion decadent, "a producer of items, which he offers... to achieve a definitive buyer in the shape in which they cleared out him... owes an obligation to the buyer to take sensible care". This president has advanced and now frames the premise of laws that shield shoppers from sullied or broken products.

could Mrs. Donoghue sue the manufacturer for breach of contract

d) No. Mrs. Donoghue did not have an agreement with the Cafe proprietor or the producer: which is the reason she sued under Torn. Her companion had contract with the shop owner.

What type of case is this?

e) It is a civil case since Negligence is a tort. Mrs. Donoghue sued Stevenson for

...

Download as:   txt (8.3 Kb)   pdf (53.7 Kb)   docx (15.5 Kb)  
Continue for 5 more pages »