Did the Government Respond Better to Big Business in the Late 19th or Early 20th Century?

The relationship between U.S. government and big business has never been trusted. Due to back in a day which is the second half of the nineteenth century effort have been made on behalf of big business, labor union, and other special interest groups to get government to work for them against their enemies. Historically, this was never more obvious than it was from the 1880s until the beginning of the World War I.

In late nineteenth century government sided with monopolist, the biggest of the big, and the richest of the rich, to keep the labor market from working freely was by using the force of government to require workers to work, often call “strike breakers”. This was the period in which the government consider as a Pro-Business.

In the early part of the twentieth century, populist groups join together to grab power of government and carry out some new laws that made really big changes for most people. These forms result in less freedom than before. After using the elected, in many ways the leaders the populists thought would deliver them to the same freedom which white males and wealthiest enjoy turn around and called for the limit of their basic right.

In the early nineteenth century, pro-business attitude of government was result of use government to force workers to work, break up the strikes. Business owners and the leaders of the time said that it was okay to do this by arguing for “liberty of contract”. This attitude was expressed in 1905 was the Lochner v. New York case, which courts ruled in a favor that bakers could not have their hours limit by the government. While public opinion would likely not come down on my side, the government responds better in this situation than the case in the early part of the twentieth century. It was also known as a Pro-Business government because the courts, in 1895 ruled that the Sherman Anti-Trust Act could not be used to break up E.C. Knight Company a sugar refining company. However, both of these situations did not have lasting effect in everyday people's lives as the twentieth century progressive era laws did. They focus on small groups of people and government sole job was still to be neutral, take neither side, hear the argument and find out whether there was wrongdoing by either party.

The increase in standard of living driven by the oil revolution, the quality of life that the families of the workers in Pittsburgh, in term to the rest of the country and world in that time, was unmatched until the Henry Ford employment revolution, after that not again until the commercialization of the internet of the 20th century.

The workers, whose work for Carnegie, were greater than mostly anywhere else in the world and largely treated the best until they convinced by lairs to break their contract. The greatest proof for this was that millions people move to Pittsburgh, Cleveland,