French Civic Nationalism Is More Normative

French civic nationalism is more normative法國公民民族主義是比較規範

法國民族主義屬於公民民族主義。在上面的分析中，這不是不安地看到，公民民族主義在法國往往是小社區的規範性理想的大規模的社會。從1789年法國大革命的法蘭西共和國政治制度的變化是明顯的，去一步一步來。例如，一個民族運動，自由，正義和政治制度變革的同時規則，可以從上面的例子看後。公民或自由主義的民族主義提倡的普遍觀念，如自由，正義和個人參與。你會看到，在法國的公民民族主義是比較規範，而不是經驗。

在另一方面，規範性民族主義是研究的道德行動，包括美德倫理學，功利，理智等。其中一個理智的主張，最好的行動應該由知識構成。取法國革命的一個例子;它屬於，因為它是支持分析儀器對規範倫理學。知識分子鼓勵群眾和下層階級推翻主權路易十六。革命以後，人民主權宣布這是指讓群眾成為共同的政治形式的整合。因此，為了設立法國共和，以保障大多數人的意志。

• What is more, Civic is a normative way, which derives other nationalism. Like US. Civic or Liberal nationalism promotes the universal ideas, such as freedom and justice, and individual participation as well. Normative ethnics are the study of ethical action, including virtue ethics, utilitarianism, intellectualism and so on.
• One of the intellectualism claims that the best action should be constituted by knowledge. Take an example of French Revolution; it belongs to normative ethnics since it was supported for analytical apparatus. The intellectuals and elites encourage mass and lower class to overthrow the sovereignty Louis XVI. After revolution, the popular sovereignty was announced which refers make a integration of masses into common political form. So, the setting up French Republican in order to safeguard majority will.
• 更重要的是，思域是一個規範性的方式，派生其他的民族主義。 像我們。公民或自由主義的民族主義提倡的普遍觀念，如自由，正義和個人參與為好。規範倫理學是研究道德的行動，包括美德倫理學，功利，理智等。
• 其中一個理智的主張，最好的行動應該由知識構成。取法國革命的一個例子;它屬於，因為它是支持分析儀器對規範倫理學。知識分子和精英鼓勵群眾和下層階級推翻主權路易十六。革命以後，人民主權宣布這是指讓群眾成為共同的政治形式的整合。因此，為了設立法國共和，以保障大多數人的意志。
• Ethnic nationalism is more empirical
• The ethnic nationalism was in empirical way. After Napoleon invasion, inside the Vienna Conference in 1815, we will see the limitation of the German. They did not have choice to express any opinion. They restored 39 sovereign states and grouped into German Confederation. Austria become the president of the confederation. Prussia had to cede Poland to Russia. The 1820, 1830 and 1848 revolutions showed more aggressive the German pursue to unify. They established the Zollverein (關稅同盟), which was the first step to unite the Germans. After Bismarck being the prime minister of Prussia, he took actively participation in unification war, including second war of Schleswig, Prussia-Austrian war and the fundamental Franco-Prussian war. The German provoke the wars. It is because they had once used the consultation and opened an assembly to pursue their goal. However, the Germans did not succeed in the Frankfurt Parliament. Finally, the Germans were determined to use “war” to achieve their goal of Unification. And they succeeded to unify German. Therefore, German is the empirical example to complete ethnic unification.
• Obviously, the German nationalism is the empirical nationalism. After Napoleonic invasion, the Vienna Conference in 1815, we are unable to find the rallying point in society or in a free and ration all order in the past. And it was not in a political act but in a given natural fact, the folk community, formed by the ties of a hoary past, and later of prehistoric biological factors. However, since Bismarck had been a prime minister, he took actively participation in unification war, including second war of Schleswig, Prussia-Austrian war and the fundamental Franco-Prussian war. Finally, Prussia successful to unified German. Therefore, German is the empirical example to complete ethnic unification.
• 民族主義是更多的經驗
• 在民族主義是實證的方式。拿破崙的入侵後，在1815年的維也納會議裡，我們將看到德國的限制。他們沒有選擇發表任何意見。他們恢復了39主權國家，並分組到德意志邦聯。奧地利成為聯盟的主席。普魯士必須割讓波蘭到俄羅斯。在1820年，1830年和1848年革命表現出更積極的德國追求統一。他們建立了關稅同盟（關稅同盟），這是團結的德國人的第一步。經過俾斯麥是普魯士首相，他積極參與了在統一戰爭中，包括石勒蘇益格的第二次戰爭中，普魯士和奧地利的戰爭的根本普法戰爭。德國挑起的戰爭。這是因為他們曾經使用了磋商並開通了裝配追求自己的目標。不過，德國人並沒有在法蘭克福議會成功。最後，德國人決心用“戰爭”來實現統一的目標。他們成功地統一德國。因此，德國的經驗為例，完成民族統一。
• 顯然，德國的民族主義是實證主義。拿破崙的入侵後，在1815年的維也納會議上，我們都無法找到在社會上還是在自由和比以往所有訂單的著力點。而且這不是一個政治行為，但在一個給定的自然事實，民間社會，一個蒼老過去的紐帶形成的，後來的史前生物因素。然而，由於俾斯麥當過首相，他積極參與了在統一戰爭中，包括石勒蘇益格的第二次戰爭中，普魯士和奧地利的戰爭的根本普法戰爭。最後，普魯士成功到統一的德國。因此，德國的經驗為例，完成民族統一。

Conclusion

Useful to speak of different civic and ethnic nation

To summarize, in a large extent, it is useful to speak of different civic and ethnic nation. Depends on either civic or ethnic nationalism, David Brown claimed that two types of nationalism are articulated by elites .