Rorshach and Adrian Veidt

In my opinion, the main argument is between Rorshach (1940-1985) and Adrian Veidt (1939-?). When the relationship between the United States and the former Soviet Union became intensive and trigged the defense system, Veidt used Dr. Manhattan to launch a nuclear bombing and blame all these to Dr. Manhattan. Because of this booming events, the United States and the former Soviet Union ended their conflict and turned to Dr. Manhattan. Veidt believed that humanity could not be changed. Thus, he sacrificed those people in New York for the survival of mankind. Maybe some audiences will raise the question, “Why can New Yorkers” sacrifice prevent the war between United States and the former Soviet union? From my understanding, the crash in New York stock exchange led to the 2008 world economic crisis was certainly a destructive disaster in New York, and will affect and shock the world even more. However, Rorshach claimed humanity can be changed. Until the moment of his death, he still wanted to let people know the truth of the plot and also hoped that mankind could hold the last opportunity during the Cold War. But based on the history of wars, it proves the theory of the cost of a few people’s life for most of the lives in victory. For

example, the Anti-Japanese War (35,000,000 of human deid), people who sacrificed are only the number in wars. Someone may wonder if you are that small part, what would you thin? Can we say we are not lucky? Or can we say the society is unfair? Or more human nature is evil, for the sake of their own interests, sacrifice the interests of others or even life at all costs? But, I want to retort that--when contradiction between people concerning fundamental interest is involved, the problem is not simply about you and me, but about the whole team or the entire human in the film.