AllFreePapers.com - All Free Papers and Essays for All Students
Search

Political Economy

Autor:   •  November 3, 2017  •  Essay  •  617 Words (3 Pages)  •  770 Views

Page 1 of 3

        Assignment 1

Q1.

A nash equilibria is a point in the game where each player chooses the strategy that maximizes his expected payoff given the strategies chosen by other players, no one has an incentive to deviate.

Player2

 

L

R

Player 1

U

3*, 4*

1,1

D

2,3

2,2

Here pure strategy nash equilibria is for Player 1 to choose U and for Player 2 is L (3;4).  For Player 1, it is better to choose U with a payoff of 3 rather than 2 when he chooses D. Similarly, selecting L with a payoff of 4 is better for Player 2 rather than choosing R with payoff of 1. Therefore, these are the best outcomes for both players in a given options.

Player 2

 

L

R

U

3*, 4*

0,0

Player 1

D

2,0

2,2

In this game the nash equilibria is the same as before. It is the best option to choose U for Player 1 with a payoff of 3 it will be irrational if he chooses D with a payoff of 2, as it is less than 3. For Player 2, L with a payoff of 4 is the best choice to get the maximum payoff. The nash equilibria has not changed because we do not have any choice for both players with a better payoffs.

Q2.

Ordering

ABC

ACB

BAC

BCA

CAB

CBA

Proportion of Voters

6%

36%

2%

31%

1%

24%

...

Download as:   txt (3.9 Kb)   pdf (171.3 Kb)   docx (12.8 Kb)  
Continue for 2 more pages »