Political Economy
Autor: komoliddin93 • November 3, 2017 • Essay • 617 Words (3 Pages) • 770 Views
Assignment 1
Q1.
A nash equilibria is a point in the game where each player chooses the strategy that maximizes his expected payoff given the strategies chosen by other players, no one has an incentive to deviate.
Player2 | |||
| L | R | |
Player 1 | U | 3*, 4* | 1,1 |
D | 2,3 | 2,2 | |
Here pure strategy nash equilibria is for Player 1 to choose U and for Player 2 is L (3;4). For Player 1, it is better to choose U with a payoff of 3 rather than 2 when he chooses D. Similarly, selecting L with a payoff of 4 is better for Player 2 rather than choosing R with payoff of 1. Therefore, these are the best outcomes for both players in a given options.
Player 2 | ||||
| L | R | ||
U | 3*, 4* | 0,0 | ||
Player 1 | ||||
D | 2,0 | 2,2 | ||
In this game the nash equilibria is the same as before. It is the best option to choose U for Player 1 with a payoff of 3 it will be irrational if he chooses D with a payoff of 2, as it is less than 3. For Player 2, L with a payoff of 4 is the best choice to get the maximum payoff. The nash equilibria has not changed because we do not have any choice for both players with a better payoffs.
Q2.
Ordering | ABC | ACB | BAC | BCA | CAB | CBA |
Proportion of Voters | 6% | 36% | 2% | 31% | 1% | 24% |
...