Critical Thinking Skill - Childhood Obesity in Usa
Autor: JianTeck Kong • March 16, 2017 • Research Paper • 5,312 Words (22 Pages) • 1,015 Views
[pic 1]
DIPLOMA IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
CRITICAL AND CREATIVE THINKING SKILLS ASSIGNMENT
Subject Code | : BLAG 0204 |
Subject Title | : CRITICAL AND CREATIVE THINKING SKILLS |
Semester | : JANUARY – MARCH 2015 |
Intake | : Dip BA April 2013 |
Group | : A |
Due Date | : 9 FEBRUARY 2015 |
Lecturer | : MS TERESA YEO |
Student Name | Student ID |
Kong Jian Teck | 13028402 |
Ling Kuang Teng | 13030887 |
Siew Le Yi | 12081550 |
Sim Li Bin | 12084414 |
Kavita Rengasamy | 11067360 |
Table of Contents
1) 1.0 Articles of Childhood Obesity………….....………………………………………3-11
1.0.1 Article 1: Childhood Obesity……………………………………………..……3-7
1.0.2 Article 2: A Big Problem…………..………………………………………….8-11
2) 1.1 Introduction……………………………………………………..……………………12
3) 1.2 Summary of Articles……………………………………………………………...13-14
1.2.1 Summary of article 1: Childhood obesity…………………………………...…13
1.2.2 Summary of article 2: A big problem………………………………………….14
4) 1.3 Critical Review……………………………………………………………………15-18
1.3.1 Similarities between both articles……………………………………………….15
1.3.2 Differences between both articles……………………………………………….15
1.3.3 Weakness argument……………………………………………………………..16
1.3.4 Strength arguments……………………………………………………………...16
1.3.5 Agreement with points of authors……………………………………………….17
1.3.6 Disagreement with point of author……………………………………………...18
5) 1.4 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………19
6) 1.5 References…………………………………………………………………………….20
1.0 Articles of Childhood Obesity
1.0.1 Article 1:
Childhood Obesity
Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection, 2015
An August 2003 lawsuit filed by the parents of two teenage girls claimed that McDonald’s was deceptive regarding the effects of their food and should therefore be held responsible for the girls’ health problems, which included obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure and cholesterol, and heart disease. Although Judge Robert Sweet ruled in favor of McDonald’s, stating that the plaintiffs failed to show that the products consumed were “dangerous in any way other than that which was open and obvious to a reasonable consumer,” the lawsuit raised the question: Who is responsible for childhood obesity?
...