Foreign Policy

So the argument goes like this: The US and the Soviets were antagonistic throughout the beginning of the Cold War, but their public statements and actions continued to escalate until they culminated in the Truman doctrine, which Logevall explicitly said was responsible for the globalization of the cold war. Marshall plan also possibly responsible because of the East-West split that resulted from it. Plus Truman envisioned Marshall plan and Truman doctrine as “two halves of the same walnut” or something folksy and Truman-esque like that.

I regards to people keeping their promises it is clear that situations are not always devoid of external and uncontrollable variables. If someone were to promise to babysit your children, but had to cancel at the last minute, yes you would feel that no one should make promises they can’t keep, but the unexpected variable is the death of the daughter’s grandmother. Which, not dealing with this tragedy could be more social unacceptable than simply not babysitting your children.

If relation to the idea that a fetus is connected to a pregnant woman’s body and therefore part of the woman’s body is a shady assumption for several reasons. First, is the concept of the word connected. If something is inside of the pregnant woman is it considered connected? Or if it is simply connected to the body through some connecting material or device? I regards to both is the idea of an injection, where as many pregnant woman receive injections for different vitamins and tests the needle that is in theory “ connected” to her arm and thus her is not part of her because it is a device of metal and plastic. Therefore, simply being connected to and inside of the human body does not make it a part of the human body, simply a

In the idea that two people aren’t compatible, then they can’t live together is an insult to the very basis of the typical American family. In regards to the idea of compatibility