Minneapolis Case

Minneapolis Pornography Ordinance

The Minneapolis Pornography Ordinance was formed by the Minneapolis City Council in order to put in place a law that will allow women to sue if they “experience sexual pleasure in being raped or mutilated”. The theory behind the Pornography Ordinance is that pornography is harmful and the victims within should have legal rights. They believe that pornography promotes rape and mutilation within its films and those who watch will obtain an attitude that justifies “aggression”. The problem with the Pornography Ordinance is that it describes pornography as being oppressive to all women whether starring in the movie or simply transporting the pornographic goods. This gives the women the right to sue the pornographer, which in reaction has the pornographic creators hiding behind the freedom of speech. Even with its good intentions to help curb the violent crimes of rape and mutilation inspired by violent pornography, the Minneapolis Pornography Ordinance still has to refine its rules to help with this conflict without crushing the freedom of speech laws allowed to every American Citizen.

What if anything do you gain while using the Top Down method? What do you Lose?

Using the top down method enables the reader to understand what the entire article is supposed to be representing just by reading the first paragraph. This saves the reader time and really drives the point of the article right off the bat. What you lose while using the top down method is that the reader may only read the first paragraph and skip the rest of the article. This can prove to be a problem because although the first paragraph may conceive the main point of the article the reader could miss out on valuable information that is provided throughout the entire article.