Uniforms and Our Childern

                                                                     School Uniforms and Our children

                                               English 122: English composition
                                                                     Mary Strahan
                                                                   November 1,2015

                        School Uniforms and Our Children

Today’s society parents should be for whether school uniforms become minatory. For the parents it is very cost effective, also, the violence that starts because of the brand name they have on their clothes is an example of students behaving badly.

School uniforms were very well known in the private schools only until about 1996, then by 2012 it had sky rocketed from 3% to 21%, of schools had the uniform policy. Although it was not specific if the students were required them to or not.  In 1994, the interest in school uniforms became active after Long Beach California has made it mandatory for 7200 elementary and middle school students. School uniforms are substantial, visible means of restoring order back in the classroom. Society acts and thinks that humans grow to house their interaction is to one another, so if perceived to feel safe, then eventually that will become the normal would be. John A. Huss, PH.D., and his research group are at the College of Education and Human Services, Educational Specialties, at Northern Kentucky University in Highlands Kentucky. The uniform representative has several great arguments. LeCompte and Pressle, Believe with evidence that the uniform policy affects the student society because students are not interested in what each person is wearing. Their self-esteem went up along with the feeling of being somewhere they belong. Education workplace is what the teachers and principal calls their school. Students come to school dressed to impress, ready to learn. Students seem to have their school spirit on the positive side. The teachers also said that they have fewer absences and tardies, they were participating in class and good grades are being made.

        One of my first findings would be that John Huss and his group had conducted at a K through five public elementary school. It was a working-class neighborhood the average people to teacher ratio was 17 and 1 20% of the students in the school were considered economically disadvantaged. Although the school did not typically fit the norms profile, high-risk gang activity, there were six caucasian elementary teachers both male and female.  The teachers’ ages are ranging from their mid-20s to late 40s; also each had to have a minimum of five years teaching experience. The average year of experience for the teachers at the school was 16.2 years. These six teachers represented 25% of the school faculty, one teacher from each grade level. The six teachers were asked what they had liked, and what they disliked on the school uniforms. In addition, the teachers were asked if they could change anything would they. In order to make their research creditable, there was no new teachers hired that year; because researchers wanted the inside story on how the students acted before the uniforms and after. Many physical and social patterns of data were collected.  The triangulation of the data was taken note of open ending interviews. The data was categorized into coding families based upon the "open coding". All the teachers were asked the same type of questions in different ways. The inclusion of the questions and credibility was from multiply informants and cross group comparison.