Frankenstein Case

After reading Chris Bond's Frankenstein: is it really about the dangers of science? I have evaluated the true purpose of science in the creation of Frankenstein's monster. Against popular belief that science is a leading factor in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, science is just a coincidental concern throughout the novel. As Bond states in the article, "Science is a side issue, for the dangers of Frankenstein, and of the Gothic in general, are much closer to home" (Bond, Chris).

In the novel, science is used as an instigator for many other situations. One of the more prominent factors is aesthetic disappointment. This is displayed after Victor finishes his creation. Victor was extremely proud of his scientific success, but disgusted with his creation. In Frankenstein, the monster is described as, "dull yellow eye ... His yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles and arteries beneath ... his shriveled complexion and straight black lips." As soon as Victor witnessed this he ran away. From the very beginning Victor displays his disappointment. This disappointment causes the monster to be estranged from common kindness and interaction. This leads to the monster's life of ostracism and violence. "This prompts disgust in his creator [Victor Frankenstein], who rushes from the room, henceforth leaving his child to face the world unguided and unprotected" (Bond, Chris).

As do many people in today's society, the monster found behaviors to deal with his ostracism. In this case, violence. The monster devoted much time and effort attempting to learn the language of humans. But, when he approached the cottagers he was faced again with vibes of aesthetic disappointment. All the monster desires is contact with humans; alas, they do not accept him. Once again, he turns to violence. His first target was Victor's younger brother, William.

In conclusion, all of the monster's flaws stem from