Analysis of Two Leadership Approaches and Their Impact on Organization

1A. analysis of two leadership approaches and their impact on organization

Autocratic leadership:

After listening to the word autocratic people have a propensity to create a negative image in their minds. That’s why the style of autocratic leadership is rarely preferred in conversation and scrutiny but still it is a rampant guidance approach in present business customs. Autocratic guidance is a supervision technique in which single individual reins most of the resolution and appreciates a little participation of other cluster associates of the organization. Autocratic influential don’t include any member suggestions or advice while making decisions rather than take decisions based on their own viewpoints and preferences.

Autocratic leadership has also some amenities in some occasions in the organization, for example while decisions required to be finished promptly without consulting with a bulky cluster of people. Some projects necessitate sturdy leadership sequentially to get things accomplished rapidly and proficiently.

“If an actor comes to me and wants to discuss his character, I say, ‘It’s in the script.’ If he says, ‘But what’s my motivation?’ I say, ‘Your salary.’” – Alfred Hitchcock

Though it benefits at some times, there are also many occasion where this leadership style may become erratic. People who mistreat or recurrently implement an autocratic leadership style are often termed as domineering, controlling and dogmatic, as a result there may be prevail umbrage and conflicts among the panel members. Since autocratic leaders don’t like to make decisions by talking to the group, people in the group may loathe that they are incapable of sharing ideas. Over the time experts have originated that autocratic leadership escorts to a lack of innovative solutions to quandary, which in due course may spoil the performance of the squad.

Autocratic leadership will be supportive in circumstances where industry faces invariable transform or crisis. This will be competent to answer to the condition rapidly in comparison to other leadership styles, because of aerodynamic organizational formation and speedy decision-making capacity.

A noteworthy case of an autocratic principal in the business area was Leona Helmsley of the Helmsley hotel chain. Her bellicose style received the lurid nickname "the Queen of Mean."

Charismatic leadership:

Charismatic leadership is the method of cheering definite actions in others by means of force to create personality, affiliation and expressive communication. Followers are being inspired to carry out things or to perform even better by charismatic leaders. This is completed by making up such enthusiasm in others that will compel them to work better for a stated purpose. The charismatic leadership style is based on a structure of bravery or heroism, acute of character, approximately of celestial origin.