Career Goal to Become Human Resources Business Partner at Google
Autor: kpandya • July 14, 2018 • Case Study • 4,628 Words (19 Pages) • 604 Views
Table of Contents
Executive Summary 2
Introduction 4
Findings 4
Poor employee management 4
Recruitment 4
Lack of HRP 5
Lack of succession planning 5
Improper staff management 5
Performance evaluation system 6
Lack of Training and development 6
Conclusion 6
Recommendations 7
Implementation plan or recruitment and selection 7
Recruitment plan 7
Determining the recruitment goals for the company 7
Planning and deciding job description 8
Recruitment strategies 8
Selection plan 8
Selection strategy 8
Bibliography 10
Introduction
With the developing society, the competition between companies is also increasing. Employers do not only look at the degree but also pay more attention to their employability skills. In order to win the competition in the market, employers look for employees who are multi skilled to perform specific job (Marais & Perkins, 2012).
The primary objective of this assignment is to understand my career goal to become Human resources business partner at Google by identifying and developing key skills to meet the goal. The ultimate goal of this assignment is to identify my own responsibilities by drawing action plan for my career growth.
Career change:
According to Arthur et al. (1989, p.8) career is ‘The evolving sequence of a person’s work experiences over time’. For many career changers, career change is a gradual processes that often a result of protean career and boundaryless career. Protean career is the ability to anticipate, adapt, and act. One need to anticipate changes before they occur, equip themselves to adapt to the changes when they arrive, and to act in the face of change when the time comes (Mangelsdorf, 2010). The goal of protean career is psychological success, achieving personal accomplishment, the most important goals in life (Kakabadse, 2005). In addition, the protean and boundaryless careers have stimulated career research to the extent that they command on review of the field (Sullivan and Baruch’s recent, 2009), so that these concepts, while once considered fundamental, have become new
...