Responsible Party: Who Is Really Responsible Mattel, Chinese Vendors, or Someone Else?

Responsible Party: Who is really responsible Mattel, Chinese vendors, or someone else?

Solution: Should companies randomly check tangible products before distribution? Should an organization take proactive measures rather than reactive measures?

Sometimes it’s not company’s actions but those of a supplier and customer that pose problems. (Bartlet & Beamish, 2012 p. 747).

Mattel’s Challenges.

Limited Control Production Control: 37 principal vendors. Managing over 3000 sub-vendors.

Cutting Cost: It is often hard to say no higher profit margin.

Limited Legal Authority: International law is joke. Chinese companies aren’t afraid of Punitive Damages. Especially it is hard to get and/or enforce legal judgments.

Indirect Affects: They are indirectly affected, Mattel will be liable not one of the 3000 Chinese companies.

In the early stage, they focused on the license revenue to support their company. However, they knew the license revenue was limited and found that advertising revenue is bigger. They created the new type of online advertisement marketing activities which provided high advertising efficiency and lower cost for their advertisement sponsors and high search quality for user for free. core competency. Financial and political uncertainty can certainly change a market. It also had for CEMEX. In 1994 Mexico was economy/American economy……

GATT/NAFTA

Acquisitions/ Spanish plant sold to buy Indonesian plant. Responsible Party: Who is really responsible Mattel, Chinese vendors, or someone else?

Solution: Should companies randomly check tangible products before distribution? Should an organization take proactive measures rather than reactive measures?