The Definition to Organized Groups

Writing Assignment #1

I don't see any disadvantage on restricting the definition to organized groups. It's a neutral way of putting it rather than directly stating who the so-called dumb sheep's team is. Everybody is different and might fall into a certain category, but organized groups are not a harsh way to put things.

I believe everyone is the leader type because leaders are not born, they are made. It sometimes takes a certain situation or event to discover what one might do. Even a dumb sheep can lead once the wolf is not around.

Every successful leader does not have a valid way of leadership. Some might hold the same concepts of other leaders, but I believe everyone is different in their own way. It's not a certain way you do things on becoming a leader. Some people might not agree on everything a leader might say or how they live their lives, but they will still follow. They see how much confidence and passion is in the leader's belief about the cause that the leader is fighting for.

I believe it's a bigger compliment to hear that I've been a better leader, rather than to hear that I've been a good manager. It would mean that I've inspired more than I've controlled. It would mean that I've helped build a good team, more than just looked after them. I think that I can be both a good leader and a good manager because both positions require one of the other, and with the perfect balance you can accomplish both titles.

Effective leadership is not a matter of opinions nor a subjective preference. It may contain some aspects of it, like having confidence in your opinion. Confidence in their beliefs and cause can be enough to fuel a leader's drive and determination.

Both Vladimir Putin and George W. Bush are not transformational leaders in my opinion. They made the economies of their countries worse than it originally started