The Effects of Whistlebolowing
Autor: Antonio • September 8, 2012 • Research Paper • 2,357 Words (10 Pages) • 1,294 Views
The Effects of Whistleblowing
Mitch J. Pearson
Park University
MG 260 Business Law 1
Professor Brent Gilje
July 13, 2011
Table of Contents
Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………3
Definition of Whistleblowing……………………………………………………………………3
Origin/History…………………………………………………………………………………....4
Effects on Organization………………………………………………………………………….5
Effects on Individual…………………………………………………………………………….7
Laws protecting Whestleblowers………………………………………………………………..8
Refrences………………………………………………………………………………………..11
Introduction
Whistleblowing is a term which has gained significant popularity over the last 50 years. Today the ability to whistleblow has become largely acceptable and in some cases rewarded. Technology has given us many tools which serve as outlets to whistleblow. Advances such as television (media), phones, cellular phones, internet, email and social media all have served as outlets for individuals to communicate wrong doing. Individuals who choose to report wrong doing in their place of employment often become seen in a negative light. This report will examine the effects on those individuals who choose to whistleblow. In order to do this, it is important to understand what whistleblowing is.
Definition of Whistleblowing
Wikipedia defines a whistleblower as a person who tells the public or someone in authority about alleged dishonest or illegal activities (misconduct) occurring in a government department, a public or private organization, or a company. There are two types of whistleblowers, internal and external. Internal whistleblowers are those individuals who advocate beliefs or revelations within the organization. External whistleblowers are individuals who advocate beliefs or revelations outside the organization. It is important to understand the significant difference between the two. Internal whistleblowers have identified an
...