Uber Case Study

[pic 2]

Q1. Should UBER Company continue with this organizational culture?

Regarding to Uber’s case and after reading the whole article, it has seemed that Uber’s organizational culture must be changed to retain their employee and to solve the internal infractions and unrestrained workplace.

Q2. What would the positive & negative consequences of your recommendation?

Any management changes must have a two side directions (positive & negative), If Uber’s top management keep their executive as it is it may lead to corrupt the company and diverted to the court, so regarding to my above suggestion my point of view is to change the top management or the directors whose made such Impolite behavior and treatment. The suitable action what Mr. Kalanick and another founder taken to change the defected part in the organization and changed the directors who didn’t obey to the company regulations.

Also the HR director must be changed because he made excuses for top performance because their ability to improve the health numerous complaints were shuffled around different regions, firings were less common!

        Regarding to what happened in Las Vegas 2015 outing Mr. Kalanick also held a companywide lecture reviewing Uber’s 14 core values, the attendees said, during the lecture Mr. Kalanick pulled onstage employee who he believed exemplified each of the values which is Mr. Michael, also the company must changes its non-qualified employee to still at its market reputation and image.

        For Ms. Huffington words, I see she is in the right track that will be changing the old Uber’s management and retain their effective employee from resignation or leaving the work and go to the competitors, and to re-prove that through not hiring the “brilliant jerks” as she said.