Research Strategy

Conduct an Internet search by visiting the state websites for Arizona, Illinois, New York, and California. Locate the legal requirements to obtain admissible statements in these states. Include your research findings in the following table. In one to three paragraphs, answer the following questions regarding the regulatory information you found while conducting your research.

1. When reviewing the legal requirements to acquire an admissible statement, what similarities did you find among the four states? 2. What differences did you find among the four states? 3. What is the most interesting concept regarding your comparison of admissible statements for these states?

Arizona Arizona Rules of Evidence/ ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS 6/ Rule 105. Limited admissibility Miranda V Arizona Mapp v. Ohio, 1961

Gideon v. Wainwright, 1963,

Escobedo v. Illinois, 1964

Illinois Illinois Rules of Evidence/ ARTICLE 3. MODERNIZATION (14) Rule 1007. Testimony or Written Admission of Party Illinois. Bryan v. Smith, 3 Ill. 47 (1839)

New York New York Rules of Evidence/ Article 60- 60.45. Interrogations, Depositions and Discovery of Documents and Property.

California California Rules of Evidence/ ARTICLE (1).GENERAL PROVISIONS RULE 350. No evidence is admissible, except relevant evidence CALIFORNIA v. GREENWOOD, 486 U.S. 35 (1988)

On 03/06/12 at 0020 hrs, I Ofc Schield was dispatched to Marquette’s Market in Midtown, Minnesota for an alleged burglary.

At 0030 hrs, I arrived on scene and met with Mr. Speedy Marquette, owner of the convenience store that was allegedly burglarized. I asked Mr. Marquette to assist me with a inspection of the interior and exterior of the property. I notice that the rear door of the establishment had been smashed and forcefully opened