AllFreePapers.com - All Free Papers and Essays for All Students
Search

Catawba Valley Highway Patrol

Autor:   •  September 20, 2016  •  Research Paper  •  1,156 Words (5 Pages)  •  1,497 Views

Page 1 of 5

Case Project #2: Catawba Valley Highway Patrol

MS 5023: Decision Analysis and Production Management

Due: March 21, 2016

Joshua Stevens

Student ID: @01099386

I. Executive Summary

District commander Broderick Crawford of the Catawba Valley Highway Patrol (in western Pennsylvania) is attempting to assign a total of 23 highway patrol units to six distinctive various road segments throughout his district. Commander Crawford has intentions of assigning a designated number of patrol cars to each distinctive road segment by optimizing his fleet in a way that best suits five primary “goals”/ objectives (listed in order of importance): maintain operating costs to less than $450/day, reduce average accident rate for the district by five accidents per million miles traveled, achieve at least 350 physical contacts/ day  and at least 30,000 sight contacts/ day by patrol units, and lower average response time to distress calls from 28 minutes to 15 minutes.

By setting up a linear goal programming equation, placing the set-up in Microsoft Excel, and using Solver to create a “solution” that optimizes the priorities of the objectives of commander Crawford, we are able to provide a model of the number of patrol units to assign to each of the six varying road segments. Based on the requirements set-forth by commander Crawford, we are able to create an optimal solution that keeps operating costs less than $450/ day, reduces accidents by 5 per million miles traveled, maintains at least 350 sight contacts/ day, with at least 2 patrol units’/ road segment; yet a maximum of 5 patrol units per road segment. We were short 4900 sight contacts/ day (from a 30,000 goal), and the average response rate was lowered from 28 minutes to 15.96 minutes.

II. Formulation of Goal Programming Problem/ Setup

Catawba Valley Highway Patrol:

x₁ = Road Segment 1: interstate, north

x₂ = Road Segment 2: urban area, north

x₃ = Road Segment 3: four-lane highway, east

x₄ = Road Segment 4: two-lane highway, west

x₅ = Road Segment 5: interstate/four-lane highway, south

x₆ = Road Segment 6: two-lane highway (heavy truck traffic), south

Objectives (goals) in order of importance:

  1. Limit daily operating costs to $450

20x₁ + 18x₂ + 22x₃ + 24x₄ + 17x₅ + 19x₆ ≤ 450

  1. Reduce average accident rate for the district by 5 accidents per million miles traveled

0.27x₁ + 0.21x₂ + 0.28x₃ + 0.19x₄ + 0.23x₅ + 0.33x₆ ≥ 5

...

Download as:   txt (7.4 Kb)   pdf (162.5 Kb)   docx (9.2 Kb)  
Continue for 4 more pages »