Theory and Practice in Courts

The United States criminal justice system has a court system that

is modulated in different parts. The Supreme court is the highest athe authoritative court in United States,and for cases to arrive at this court, they must past through a variety of courts and have a legitimate consequence toward the nation.

You also have state, appellate, and local courts that serve jursidictions where criminal cases must be trailed and sentenced for fair due process of every citizen that is a suspect. It is vital to understand that certain crimes like fraud can be due process of every citizen that is a suspect. It is vital to understand that certain crimes like fraud can be not only in the criminal sections of the justice system but also in the civil, where another set of courts provide judgements over cases that do not have to be criminal also in the civil, where another set of courts can provide judgements over cases that do not have to be criminal but of assets •What is the dual court system? Why do we have a dual-court system in America? Could the drive toward court unification eventually lead to a monolithic court system? Would such a system be effective?

•Judges have specific philosophical rationales and sentencing guidelines when providing a judgment over presented facts. If you were a judge, what would be your sentencing goals and philosophical rationales? Why? Can you envision any circumstances that might make your guidelines or sentencing goals change? Why? Provide an example of a situation that might be extremely difficult to judge that could put you as a judge in a situation to change your sentencing goals or philosophical rationales