Citizens of the United States Are Privileged to the All Rights Granted to Them by the Constitution

　　　　Citizens of the United States are privileged to the all rights granted to them by the constitution, meaning that every citizen has equal rights under this document. In majority of cases citizens are able to partake in these rights as stated by the constitution, but there is a group of people that the rights do not extend to. A child has minimal rights because of their age and inexperience with life events. Children do not have rights that granted to them by the constitution instead it up to the minor's guardian to advocate for them until the are of age. The treated of children there have been the subject of several cases that ended up in higher courts and have gone as far as the Supreme Courts to obtain a final ruling. A majority of these cases have bases of the first and fourth amendment the freedom of speech and the search and seizure. Every citizen in this country is born with rights granted to them where does it stipulate that there must be a age limit. Children are said to be ignorant and experienced in life because of this idea they do not have the maturity to comprehend their rights or they could manipulated into certain actions because of their desire to fit in to society.

　　　　A problem with the search and seizure methods that are used in the school system is that the are performed by teaching personal rather than law enforcement. Most teaching personnel lack the knowledge or experience to screen people who could could be considered a threat to themselves or others. Where law enforcement agents

　　　　 This I believe is the biggest problem because the law enforcement officials need to be doing this job they know what to look for and they know the signs of someone who could possibly hurt other students; police officers for example see violence everyday so they know what they are looking for.

　　　　There were both forms of inductive and deductive logic used in most cases which I will list some of the cases before I go further in this section. One case in particular that sparked a lot of interest and outrage was New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985). This case was about two girls that were caught smoking in the bathroom which they had been asked about earlier and they denied it. This time they were caught, and brought to the principal’s office where he took the girls purse and emptied it. When he did this he found cigarettes, drug paraphernalia such as a marijuana pipe and marijuana. There was also a list of people that owed her money with a lot of money with the list. So in this case the deductive logic was used as a premise that this girl was not using drugs but also selling them at school. The inductive side of logic in this case was that the data that was found upon researching this was found to support the deductive logic. The premise was this girl was using drugs, and after the search it was confirmed she was.

　　　　This search in this particular