Camp Happy Valley in London, ontario
Autor: angan • March 16, 2018 • Case Study • 1,136 Words (5 Pages) • 651 Views
Page 1 of 5
- Introduce the company
General Facts
- Camp Happy Valley in London, Ontario
- It is a camp for about 1,500 campers and employed 500 staff.
- This camp provides well as indoor activities for the children.
- No waterfront activities due to location
- November, 2000, Sue Johnston has promoted Adam Cameron to become the new programmer
- to help boost up the morale and fun to the campers and staff.
- He is finding it hard to manage his time to organize the camp and his studies.
- Approximately 800,000 children attended camp in Ontario each summer
- Approximately 125,000 staff were employed by camps in Ontario each summer
- Ontario gross revenues of camps were $460,000,000
- Happy Valley is a non-for profit organization, paying junior staff $533/summer and senior $1980/summer
- Happy Valley paid junior swim staff $1500/summer and senior swim staff $2500/summer plus an additional cost of $60/each swim staff for extra training
- Happy valley charged $700/camper for 2 weeks, $1,100/4 weeks, $1,600/6 weeks or $2,000/8 weeks
Employment Standards Act
- Camp staff is able to be exempt from minimum wage, overtime pay, and public holidays
- Removal of the exemptions would lead to decreased quality of camp, decrease financial assistance to campers, raised camp fees and camp closures
Super Staff team
- Happy Valley has a super staff team that does the majority of the work
- This team includes the program director, 10 section heads, the swim director, 3 head swim staff, the programmer, and 5 administrative sweat
- The team is chosen at the end of each summer (no later than December) by Sue Johnson, the camp director
- The team is required to conduct new staff interviews
Staff Selection
- Staff receive a mid summer evaluation and a final evaluation. This decided whether or not they will be hired the following year.
- Staff interviews are not regulated, nor is there a schedule
- Staff interviewed approx 1000 new staff member each year for 470 positions
- Staff are evaluated on spirit, responsibility, maturity level, and related experience
- Staff candidates must supply 3 references, and Happy Valley must hear back from at least 2 of them
- This results in time taken up, and candidates often have another job by the time the references get back to them
- Happy Valley looks for new staff at the YMCA, employment services, high schools, and local swim pools
Staff morale
- Staff must work as a team
- Cameron has never planned a training week before
- Pre-camp training is based around a 75 page manual
- Team building activities were not until the end of the day
- Campers have recently had a poor attitude at camp
- The camp infirmary has shown an increase in camper attendance
- Existing Organizational Chart
- Add
- Identifying Problems
- Recruitment and staff retention
- Low staff retention (1 in 4 return)
- Competitive recruiting environment
- Limited resources
- Interview process – recruitment and selection is not well established and lacks organization
- No strict hiring process / structure
- Too long to check references
- Not enough time
- No advertising – rely on references
- Training
- Inefficient Training Structure
- Boring – staff were not motivated
- Team building was ineffective
- Resulted in poorly trained unmotivated staff
- Negatively affected overall camp morale
- Performance Appraisal
- Compensation
- Low wages
- Limited resources mean not able to offer competitive pay structure
- Effects employee retention and ability to recruit quality staff
- Department
- Split in wrong way with no coordination
- Proposal for better organizational Chart
- Administrative tasks are overwhelming for “super staff”
Solutions:
- Increase recruitment advertising to target higher education students
- Target Market:
- Higher education students
- Interest in child care or social services who want to with kids
- Possible Co-op program in future (?)
- Sources
- Colleges - Universities
- Career Centers
- Online
- Job fairs
Benefits:
- Increased exposure for the camp
- Attract a larger pool of qualified candidates
- Properly qualified staff will:
- Have higher job satisfaction
- Better job performance
- Be more enthusiastic and mature
- Increased camp morale
- Develop and implement a structured recruitment process
- Formalize the recruitment process
- To be written and implemented immediately
- Group interviews (?)
- Increase recruitment advertising
Benefits:
- Hiring Process more efficient
- Increased competitive edge to hire more qualified staff
- Retention of qualified staff who will provide best experience for campers
- Increased camp morale
- Develop a new approach to full staff training week
- Insert team building activities into training
Benefits:
- Increased participation and enthusiasm
- Increased job performance from staff
- Increased satisfaction from campers
- Increased camp morale
- Hire additional staff to support super staff during pre-camp
- Benefits
- Added support for super staff
- More time for super staff to plan and attend workshops
- Increased organization – better training
- Increased job performance
- Increased camp morale
- Increase compensation structure
- Benefits
- Recruitment incentive
- Higher job satisfaction
- Increased job performance
- Increased camp morale
- Control and feedback to measure the success of the recommendations:
- Administer surveys to campers and staff (mid-season and end of season)
- Financial trends to monitor changes in enrollement
1 Year Action Plan
[pic 1]
...