Wells Fargo Lays out Strategy to Move Past Scandal

                                Wells Fargo Lays Out Strategy to Move Past Scandal

The article “Wells Fargo Lays Out Strategy to Move Past Scandal” by Emily Glazer that appeared in the Wall Street Journal on October 11, 2016 says that CEO John Stumpf and the executive who ran the bank's retail banking division will forfeit tens of millions of dollars in additions as the bank tries to shoot a scandal over its sales practices.

The board of managements at the nation's second-largest bank said Tuesday that Stumpf will forfeit $41 million in stock awards, while former retail banking administrative Carrie Tolstedt will forfeit $19 million of her stock prizes, effective directly. Both are also giving up any bonuses for 2016, and Tolstedt will not obtain any compensation or any other return in connection with her leaving, the bank's directors said.

Yes, Wells Fargo paid a $185 million compensation with regulators and a city authorized about a month ago. It has since faced public outrage, two congressional hearings and a raft of central and state investigations, including by the Justice Department (Glazer. E, 2016).

Mr. Stumpf, who the panel said last month lost $41 million in pay linked to the issues, said he visited an amount of separations late last week and clearly this has not helped. He said the net new commercial in the skill bank will be unhappy for a while there’s just no query about that.

Wells Fargo had been under pressure from lawgivers and others to implement its decision-making reward claw back supplies after the bank agreed to pay $185 million to settle allegations its employees opened millions of accounts without customers' agreement to reach violent sales targets (Glazer, E. (2016).

Stumpf was long admired for keeping wells until recently free of scandal. The bank did not capitalize in as many toxic loans in the 2000s as its complements, and Stumpf initially weakened to take bailout money from Washington before tolerant it in a sign of unity.

He also was able to expand Wells meaningfully as a result of the disaster, buying up Wachovia. That gave the bank known for its stagecoach logo, which was chiefly a West Coast and Southern bank, access to the profitable East Coast and New York banking markets (Cowley, S. (2016).

Overdraft fees have been an anxiety of watchdogs for some time. This is because of costs and changes by some banks in new years to reorder dealings, posting larger dealings against an account first to increase odds a customer will overdraw the explanation and be charged many fees.

Wells Fargo has been decentralized for a number of years and it sometimes hasn’t been clear where risk managers reported into, current and former executives have said (Andriotis. A, 2016).

Wells Fargo learned from the misconduct that Wells Fargo & Co. managers lacking bankers to sign up customers for possibly costly overdraft defense that they didn’t always need or realize they were getting, according to present and former bankers and managers.

Members of Congress spoken concern about possible overdraft problems at the bank during two ranges last month with Wells Fargo Chief Executive John Stumpf. He was called to Capitol Knoll after the bank in September obvious to a $185 million fine and implementation action over what the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau called the “widespread illegal practice” of opening illegal accounts (Gray, A. (2016).