Bioethics - Cloning a Human Personal Identity

The discussion on the topic of work put in question should probably start from even a short characterization of what a human personal identity, and what is its relationship with cloning. In the case of the latter concepts do not have major problems with diagnosis, as mentioned, however, identity, seemingly so easy to understand, in fact, turns out to be quite puzzling term. When it comes to cloning, duplication of organisms? not surprising at the same time raises issues of the identity of the individual, especially when it comes to man.

What is meant by the concept of identity? According to the encyclopedic definition? This unity of being, which is on the ground of philosophy and human can be represented as? being yourself, being that who they serve. This concept is different from the identity, although some may notice some similarity between them. However, the identity of something, as opposed to its identity, refers to itself, and not something else. Differs from a qualitative numerical identity. The first lies in the fact that if I have x and y, and there is a numerical identity between them? they are one and the same object. In the case of qualitative t? all the internal and external characteristics are similar, but they are also distinct? objects.

Cloning? mean? procedure for the preparation of organisms of the same genetic information, usually via transfer procedure somatic cell nucleus into the egg nucleus previously lacking. For the cloning procedure used is plant-differentiation of donor cells into meristematic cells? . It is not a natural process of the formation of the new organization, it is not surprising, therefore, that the subject is controversial. Starting from the basic, which is the issue of human rights to perform this task, and ending on the problem of identity is created beings.

Of course there are many rational reasons behind? recognition of cloning as a method of legal and safe, such as in the process of cloning to