AllFreePapers.com - All Free Papers and Essays for All Students
Search

Tesco - Engaging in Critical Business Enquiry

Autor:   •  August 9, 2016  •  Business Plan  •  5,906 Words (24 Pages)  •  935 Views

Page 1 of 24

Engaging in Critical Business Enquiry

[pic 1]

Student Assessment Guide

January 2016

Prior to beginning your assessment it is vital to read this document in detail. Failure to do so will significantly disadvantage you and may well affect levels of attainment

Some general guidance:

  • Please check you understand the requirements of the assessments; this module has a very strong emphasis on the use of academic literature. If you remain unclear on what is expected,  you must book to see a member of the module leadership team.

  • While teaching staff will be more than happy to support you in the development of your work, we will not read complete drafts nor provide indicators of potential grades. If you would like to discuss plans or early drafts, then we would be happy to do this, but you must book time well in advance of the submission date.
  • Failure to engage in significant research and wider reading of suitable academic sources will have a significant impact on your marks. Engaging in research is a vital skill both at university and when moving on.If you are unclear on the suitability of a resource you have found, please ask; do not assume.
  • It is vital you put effort into each ELEMENT of the module. A mark of under 35% in a COMPONENT will mean you will be required to repeat all work in that section, even if you have passed some of it previously (see below for details regarding components and elements)

Overview of Assessment

On successful completion of this module you will be able to:

  • Understand the role and relevance of business enquiry to student’s academic and professional context, including the student’s own future professional ambitions
  • Demonstrate the ability to identify, analyse and evaluate sources of business information, considering their origins, context and content
  • Understand the context of business and management research and other sources of business information, and their relative roles in contributing to business knowledge, with respect to their programme of study
  • Have started to develop critical thinking skills - constructively critiquing the research of others, identifying strengths and weaknesses in technique, analysis and conclusions.
  • Be able to produce different types of written and oral work appropriate to the programme of study and observing the conventions of academic writing
  • Further develop and demonstrate skills in note taking, summarising, paraphrasing and referencing

Feedback

You will receive feedback in a range of forms        .

Summative, individual essay/assignment feedback will be provided on a feedback form in the appropriate format. Assignment marks and feedback will be made available by four working weeks after submission (this does not include holiday periods).

Additional Formative Feedback will be provided as follows:

Feedback Format

Weeks 1 to 12: Questions in lectures, workshops and seminars

Weeks 2 to 12: Discussion in lectures, workshops and seminars

Weeks 1 to 12: Via the Blackboard EiCBE forum

Weeks 1 to 12: Written and oral feedback provided in your feedback portfolio based on weekly activities.

Weeks 1 to 10 Individual meetings with course lecturers, as appropriate or you individual tutors which can be booked by email.

How is the module assessed?

There are two formal assessments that make up this module:

Coursework: (worth 70% of the module)

50% portfolio      SUBMITTED IN WORKSHOPS AND SEMINARS

50% structured literature review DUE 2PM 7th APRIL 2016 - ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION

Examination: (worth 30% of the module)

50% poster presentation viva (taking place in the last workshop in week 39): Details are provided in your workshop book.

50% statistical online test – DEADLINES POSTED ON BLACKBOARD

Your portfolio activities must be submitted to your tutor for review during each week in your workshops.

EXAMINATION PART 1 - Poster presentation

50% of examination, 15% of module

 You will be assessed on the basis of your knowledge of undertaking a basic research project. You will be required to complete in groups a 12 week research project on the topic of your choice, but falling into one of the key themes presented in this module.

You will complete and present an academic research poster sized A2. You will receive an examination known as a viva voce, an oral defence of your research – this will take place in class in the final week’s workshop.

N.B. In order to present them at the degree conference, all posters must be submitted to module staff by the morning of 20th April at the very latest (the venue for submission will be advised during workshops). This is the date of your conference.  In order to present your poster for assessment it must be brought to the final workshop of term (week beginning 18th April).

  • You will be asked a series of questions based on your poster and on your learning across the year.
  • You will be asked to provide peer to peer feedback on each of the presentations.
  • The criteria will be made explicit prior to the session but are presented below.

The following criteria will be applied to your research projects, marks are individual but work presented as a group.

Aspect Criteria Mark         

Aim(s)/ Introduction

MARKS

• Aim is not stated, no introduction.

0

• Aim is vaguely stated, introduction fails to describe the background/ outline of work undertaken.

1

• Aim is accurate and clearly stated, adequate description of background/ outlines of work undertaken.

2

• Exceptional/ clear comprehensive description of aims, background and outlines of work undertaken.

3

Methodology

• No mention of methods/ materials used.

0

• Some mention of methods/ materials used.

1

• Methods and materials are almost complete and mostly accurate.

2

• Accurate and complete account of methods/ materials used.  

3

A critical and well considered and justified methodological discussion

4

Literature Review

No review of the literature presented or integrated into poster

0

Some attempt to review the literature, but errors in literature utilised

1

A descriptive review of the literature

2

Some clear attempts to be critical but limited development

3

Outstanding critical review

4 – 5

Results & Discussion

• No analysis and results given or totally incorrect.

0

• Incorrect analysis of data, results are incomplete and vaguely presented.

1

• Adequate analysis of data, results are accurate, some discussion of results is attempted.

2

• Analysis of data, results, and discussions are accurate and complete.

3

• Analysis of data, results, and discussion are accurate and complete, with suitable illustrations

4

• Method and logic of analysis, results and discussion are accurate and complete, with suitable illustrations.  

5

• Method and logic of analysis, results and discussion are accurate and complete, with suitable illustrations and engage critically with the academic literature

6

Conclusion

• No conclusion is attempted or conclusion is wrong.

0

• Conclusion is partly correct but incomplete.

1

• Conclusion is correct and almost complete.

2-3

• Conclusion is correct, complete, related to the aim of the research and suggestions for improvement of research are given.

4-5

References

• References are not given

0

• References are incomplete and not arranged according to convention

1

• References are complete, properly written and arranged according to convention.

2

Organisation and presentation of poster

Organisation of poster is not logical with untidy presentation.

0

Organisation is logical but presentation is untidy.

1 – 2

Organisation of poster is neat and logical

3 – 5

Individual contribution

0 – 10

Quality of presentation

0 - 10

TOTAL Marks available 50

...

Download as:   txt (36.1 Kb)   pdf (442.4 Kb)   docx (732 Kb)  
Continue for 23 more pages »